The siphon filter may well represent a worthy improvement on traditional ceramic filter designs - both pot and dual-vessel gravity driven devices using cylindrical candles.
1) They can be employed using existing traditional water storage containers, and thus do not require as dramatic a behavior change among end-users.
2) They are much smaller and more compact, and thus far more economical to transport.
3) The capacity of the filters can be much higher than traditional dual-chamber devices if a long length of tubing is employed for the creation of much greater (elevation) hydraulic head
4) Finally, they should be significantly less expensive than standard countertop devices, which is significant, because upfront capital costs are thought to represent another important barrier to device adoption.
Ron Rivera and Potters for Peace should be applauded for pursuing this design. An essential question to study here is the ability to maintain consistent quality control of the devices across the decentralized network of manufacturers to which PFP is providing technical support. It will also be important to examine end-user receptiveness to the design, as well as the storage or dispensing containers (glasses? Buckets? Pitchers?) into which water is fed after passing through the siphon filter from the larger storage container.
Hi Ron this is Charles Veach with world health alliance international. It has been awhile since I spoke to you in New York. Hope all is well with your family. It is wonderful to see PFP in this contest. PFP has helped many people over the years and is with your product. I wish you all the best in this contest your heart and company are in the right place.
Please call me at 510-742-1077 or skype me at cveach270
Comentarios
The siphon filter may well represent a worthy improvement on traditional ceramic filter designs - both pot and dual-vessel gravity driven devices using cylindrical candles.
1) They can be employed using existing traditional water storage containers, and thus do not require as dramatic a behavior change among end-users.
2) They are much smaller and more compact, and thus far more economical to transport.
3) The capacity of the filters can be much higher than traditional dual-chamber devices if a long length of tubing is employed for the creation of much greater (elevation) hydraulic head
4) Finally, they should be significantly less expensive than standard countertop devices, which is significant, because upfront capital costs are thought to represent another important barrier to device adoption.
Ron Rivera and Potters for Peace should be applauded for pursuing this design. An essential question to study here is the ability to maintain consistent quality control of the devices across the decentralized network of manufacturers to which PFP is providing technical support. It will also be important to examine end-user receptiveness to the design, as well as the storage or dispensing containers (glasses? Buckets? Pitchers?) into which water is fed after passing through the siphon filter from the larger storage container.
Hi Ron this is Charles Veach with world health alliance international. It has been awhile since I spoke to you in New York. Hope all is well with your family. It is wonderful to see PFP in this contest. PFP has helped many people over the years and is with your product. I wish you all the best in this contest your heart and company are in the right place.
Please call me at 510-742-1077 or skype me at cveach270
Cordially,
Charles Veach
Sr. Director
Enviar un comentario nuevo